top of page

The State of Digital Trust in Singapore 2026

ONESECURE
Sep 6
2 min read

ONESECURE reveals why external digital identity exposure is becoming a governance issue across sectors.


Digital trust increasingly extends beyond the systems and identities an organisation directly controls. An organisation can secure the domains and services it owns, yet customers, employees, partners or citizens may still encounter external identities they reasonably associate with it.


This creates a distinction between what an organisation controls and what others may trust as representing it. Similar-looking domains are one observable part of that external trust surface. Their significance can change when infrastructure, content or behaviour changes how convincingly that external identity can represent the legitimate organisation to others.


ONESECURE's analysis of 120,702 distinct lookalike domains across 448 reference organisation domains identifies four important patterns:


  1. External exposure is widespread, but uneven.

    Large lookalike populations are common, while the potential investigative burden varies significantly between organisations.


  2. Observable infrastructure creates different investigative states.

    Lookalike domains do not all present the same characteristics. Infrastructure adds context that can help distinguish which observations warrant closer examination.


  3. The heavier investigative burden is concentrated.

    A smaller portion of organisations accounts for a disproportionate share of the more infrastructure-configured exposure observed in the study.


  4. The external surface continues to change.

    New domains continue to appear in different observable states, while existing identities may change over time.


Together, these findings point to a broader governance issue.


The challenge is no longer simply discovering external identities. It is determining what deserves attention, recognising when its relevance changes, understanding when that change becomes material and knowing who is responsible for acting.

The objective is not to treat every lookalike as a threat. It is to build the ability to identify meaningful change early enough to make an informed decision.




bottom of page